Hi there,

At the moment I don't have many time to redevelop my webpage. Furthermore, I am reading the book from Larry Kaufmann for an review I have interest to create.

But for the moment you can visit a TOP-8 tourney in LIVE mode if you have interest.

4x more time as in SWCR ...

URL:
http://www.amateurschach.de/ftptrigger/test-01.html

Code:

Code:
Conditions:
#Time control: 40/40 "repeatedly"
#Game average: 160 minutes
# - 8 games running to the same time
# - 10 games per match, 10 engines = 450 games
# - Tournament time: January 27th, 2012 - February 03th, 2012
#Resign: OFF
#Ponder: ON
#Learning: OFF
#Endgames: 4-pieces, 32Mb cache
#Opening books: OWN v5.11
#GUI: Shredder Classic 4
#OS: Windows XP Prof. x64 Edition
#Processors: Intel, 4xQ9550 2,83GHz
#Cores: 1 core for each engine
#Hash-Tables: 512Mb

Games are in around one week available for donwload.
Have fun with this little tourney.

Best
Frank

Thanks Frank. What about Strelka 5.1 ?

Hi,

I try out this engine for a while. I think Strelka is the same as Houdini. Also it works not correct with ponder. So this tourney stopped from time to time as reason for GUI crashes. But I think the opponents are OK.

Interesting is to see ... the Rybka Exp. 42 setting with longer time controls and I will see the PHQ setting with the newer SF 2.2.2 version. Not sure, normaly you can't try out a setting for version x for an other version. So I am thinking it's not a good idea but perhaps ...

I think I will replay this tourney 2x or 4x :-) I don't know so far. Could be interesting to compare the results with the same engine from tounrney 1 with 2, with 3 and to create a table with all this results.

Best
Frank

Hi there,

Final results:

Code:

FCP, 40/40, ponder=on, Q9550  2012

                                1          2          3          4          5          6          7          8          9          0         
1  Komodo 4.0 x64              ********** ½1½½1½½½1½ 10½11½½½1½ 0½½11½½½1½ ½01½0½½½01 ½½½11½0101 ½½½1½1000½ 1½½1½0½0½½ 1½½01½½½½½ 1½½½11½½1½  51.5/90  2273.25
2  Houdini 2.0c x64            ½0½½0½½½0½ ********** 011½½10½1½ 110½1½1½½1 ½01½½10½0½ ½1½10½1½½½ 10½11½½½½½ 0½½1½0½½½0 ½1½½½1½½11 1½011111½½  51.5/90  2238.75
3  Stockfish 2.2.2 JA x64      01½00½½½0½ 100½½01½0½ ********** ½½½½11½01½ 1½½½1½1½½½ ½½000011½½ 111½0½½½½1 ½½010½0½11 11½½½1½1½½ ½1½11111½½  50.5/90
4  Rybka 4 x64 Exp. 42        1½½00½½½0½ 001½0½0½½0 ½½½½00½10½ ********** ½½½½0½½0½0 ½½1111½½0½ ½1½01111½½ ½1½11½0½11 11½11½½½½½ 1½½1½½11½1  49.5/90
5  Stockfish 2.1.1 JA x64 PHQ  ½10½1½½½10 ½10½½01½1½ 0½½½0½0½½½ ½½½½1½½1½1 ********** ½0½000½½11 00½½½10½½0 01½1½0½1½½ ½1½1½1½½½½ 01½1½½1½½½  46.5/90
6  Critter 1.4 x64            ½½½00½1010 ½0½01½0½½½ ½½111100½½ ½½0000½½1½ ½1½111½½00 ********** ½11½½1½0½0 ½1½1½½½1½½ ½1½0½½½½½½ ½½½½½½½101  46.0/90
7  IvanHoe 999946hm x64        ½½½0½0111½ 01½00½½½½½ 000½1½½½½0 ½0½10000½½ 11½½½01½½1 ½00½½0½1½1 ********** 0½1½1½½1½½ ½10½0½0½½0 ½½1½½0½111  43.0/90  1907.00
8  RobboLito 0.10 x64          0½½0½1½1½½ 1½½0½1½½½1 ½½101½1½00 ½0½00½1½00 10½0½1½0½½ ½0½0½½½0½½ 1½0½0½½0½½ ********** ½½½½½½0½½½ ½½½1½11½11  43.0/90  1903.50
9  Rybka 4.1 x64              0½½10½½½½½ ½0½½½0½½00 00½½½0½0½½ 00½00½½½½½ ½0½0½0½½½½ ½0½1½½½½½½ ½01½1½1½½1 ½½½½½½1½½½ ********** ½1½½1½½1½0  40.0/90
10  Chiron 1.1a x64            0½½½00½½0½ 0½100000½½ ½0½00000½½ 0½½0½½00½0 10½0½½0½½½ ½½½½½½½010 ½½0½½1½000 ½½½0½00½00 ½0½½0½½0½1 **********  28.5/90

ELOstat 1.1

Code:

    Program                            Score    %    Av.Op.  Elo    +  -    Draws

  1 Houdini 2.0c x64              :  51.5/ 90  57.2  2945  2996  50  50  52.2 %
  2 Komodo 4.0 x64                :  51.5/ 90  57.2  2945  2996  48  47  56.7 %
  3 Stockfish 2.2.2 JA x64        :  50.5/ 90  56.1  2946  2989  51  51  50.0 %
  4 Rybka 4 x64 Exp. 42            :  49.5/ 90  55.0  2947  2982  50  50  52.2 %
  5 Stockfish 2.1.1 JA x64 PHQ    :  46.5/ 90  51.7  2949  2961  48  47  56.7 %
  6 Critter 1.4 x64                :  46.0/ 90  51.1  2950  2957  48  48  55.6 %
  7 IvanHoe 999946hm x64          :  43.0/ 90  47.8  2952  2937  50  51  51.1 %
  8 RobboLito 0.10 x64            :  43.0/ 90  47.8  2952  2937  47  47  57.8 %
  9 Rybka 4.1 x64                  :  40.0/ 90  44.4  2954  2916  41  42  66.7 %
 10 Chiron 1.1a x64                :  28.5/ 90  31.7  2964  2830  48  50  52.2 %

It seems that my provider have problems.
So my webpage isn't available so far and I have to add the games a little bit later.

Congratulation to the Komodo team.
But with longer time control it's clear that Houdini, Robbolito, Ivanhoe and Rybka 4.1 lost a bit points and Stockfish and Komodo, also the very strong Rybka 4 Exp. setting is stronger. I think the final results are very clear, not new information for myself.

Best
Frank

http://www.amateurschach.de/test-tourneys-2012/t-01/test-01.htm

Here you can find all information, also game download:
CBH with Shredder GUI comments & PGN without comments.

Have fun with this files.

Best
Frank