Hi all.

Anyone out there who has been testing a little to find out which engine(s) who do the best performance in gambit play? And I`m not thinking of blitz, and espescially not without increment. I`m thinking about relatively longer games/ with increment, so that the engine(s) have their wits about it :-)

Farbror

rybka, criter and houdini are good for long games

Did you read what I posted?

The point was gambit play,a and which engine was best in longer games.

farbror

Ok, just to clear things up. Gambit play. One example: Let`s say the moves:

1.e4-e6 2.b3!?-d5 3.Bb2-dxe4 4.Nc3-Nf6 5.f3!?-exf3 is played.

My question is>;

Which engine will give the best and truly evaluation and play/contiuation for white?

I hope someone will prefer Qxf3 followed by long castle, = gambit play !!

Farbror

Houdini
Critter
Deep Junior
Zappa Mexico

jnhes wrote:Houdini
Critter
Deep Junior
Zappa Mexico

Ok and thx jnhes

Farbror

Regarding Deep Junior 13.3 and gambit play.

Has anyone here tried to adjust the "Contempt"-value in the Parameter with luck?

It says on their homepage that a value of 25 is a quarter of a pawn in the engines evaluation (the default is zero). So I thought maybe a value of 50-100 would be adequat for gambit play.

Anybody tried? Any thoughts?

Farbror

the best is weak delfi

@farbrorsniff wrote:Hi all.

Anyone out there who has been testing a little to find out which engine(s) who do the best performance in gambit play? And I`m not thinking of blitz, and espescially not without increment. I`m thinking about relatively longer games/ with increment, so that the engine(s) have their wits about it :-)

Farbror

Critter !!