Chess2u
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Chess2uLog in

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
ChessRockers 1.0 (free) Logo11

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
Overall elo?

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
Password   :   Chessrockers

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz

wrong password

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
ChessRockers 1.0:
Password: chessrockers

Worked for me.


ChessRockers 1.1: No password needed, but 7zpacker didnt work. Use latest RarZilla. That worked for me. But only 64bit Popcount and BMI2 versions.

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
Its obviously a Stockfish-derivative. But the testresults posted here are incredible (more than 63% against Komodo 9.2...) and suggest, that ChessRockers 1.0 is measureable stronger than the latest Stockfish-Dev.  
I doubt that. But I will give ChessRockers 1.0 (64bit, Popcount) a try and play some thousand games with my SPCC test-conditions (http://spcc.beepworld.de ).
Then we will have a independent and valid result of ChessRockers 1.0. (Test of ChessRockers 1.1 will only follow, if ChessRockers 1.0 is really stronger than the latest Stockfish-Dev).

Stay tuned!

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyChessRockers 1.1 64 bit

more_horiz
WOW, STRONG! thumb up

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
thumb up thumb up thumb up thumb up gracias

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
My enemies
Please don't use my engine

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyNot work the password

more_horiz
The password not work! Please new link. wink

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
pass = chessrockers

it works

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
@pohl4711 wrote:
Its obviously a Stockfish-derivative. But the testresults posted here are incredible (more than 63% against Komodo 9.2...) and suggest, that ChessRockers 1.0 is measureable stronger than the latest Stockfish-Dev.  
I doubt that. But I will give ChessRockers 1.0 (64bit, Popcount) a try and play some thousand games with my SPCC test-conditions (http://spcc.beepworld.de ).
Then we will have a independent and valid result of ChessRockers 1.0. (Test of ChessRockers 1.1 will only follow, if ChessRockers 1.0 is really stronger than the latest Stockfish-Dev).

Stay tuned!


analyzing the files of this "garbage" I found the 99.99999% of equality with Stockfish. Out of curiosity I issued a challenge with the same Stockfish than a week old and this is the partial result ....

I75960x
Perfect book 2015t
time 3 '+ 0 "
TB 5 men syzygy
LP on for ChessRockers 1.0

ChessRockers 1.0 (free) Immagi10

conclusions:
a waste of time....

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
"garbage",,why..is a Stockfish, but, a more recent,...maybe.. a sf 021115...is something creative, to test my books..with another personality.... Im using 1.1 64

Last edited by ADY125 on Wed Nov 25, 2015 6:18 pm; edited 2 times in total

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
@Alexa1978 wrote:


analyzing the files of this "garbage" I found the 99.99999% of equality with Stockfish. Out of curiosity I issued a challenge with the same Stockfish than a week old and this is the partial result ....

I75960x
Perfect book 2015t
time 3 '+ 0 "
TB 5 men syzygy
LP on for ChessRockers 1.0

ChessRockers 1.0 (free) Immagi10

conclusions:
a waste of time....


OK. Thanx for this information. Because at the moment no functional patches of Stockfish are released, I have some free CPU-time. So it is no problem to play some thousand games with ChessRockers. Each new engine release should get one chance. I am a curious tester, too.
And 2000-3000 games will prove, if ChessRockers ist junk or a real progress.

Regards - Stefan

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
@pohl4711 wrote:
@Alexa1978 wrote:


analyzing the files of this "garbage" I found the 99.99999% of equality with Stockfish. Out of curiosity I issued a challenge with the same Stockfish than a week old and this is the partial result ....

I75960x
Perfect book 2015t
time 3 '+ 0 "
TB 5 men syzygy
LP on for ChessRockers 1.0

ChessRockers 1.0 (free) Immagi10

conclusions:
a waste of time....


OK. Thanx for this information. Because at the moment no functional patches of Stockfish are released, I have some free CPU-time. So it is no problem to play some thousand games with ChessRockers. Each new engine release should get one chance. I am a curious tester, too.
And 2000-3000 games will prove, if ChessRockers ist junk or a real progress.

Regards - Stefan
friend, please let us know everything a boat it..... thumb up

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
i play today against chessrockers 1.1 and was draw ...so..some peoples are using in play chess.. the man name is EMADMAFIA.... It will be a co FORUM...?

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
@Alexa1978 wrote:
@pohl4711 wrote:
Its obviously a Stockfish-derivative. But the testresults posted here are incredible (more than 63% against Komodo 9.2...) and suggest, that ChessRockers 1.0 is measureable stronger than the latest Stockfish-Dev.  
I doubt that. But I will give ChessRockers 1.0 (64bit, Popcount) a try and play some thousand games with my SPCC test-conditions (http://spcc.beepworld.de ).
Then we will have a independent and valid result of ChessRockers 1.0. (Test of ChessRockers 1.1 will only follow, if ChessRockers 1.0 is really stronger than the latest Stockfish-Dev).

Stay tuned!


analyzing the files of this "garbage" I found the 99.99999% of equality with Stockfish. Out of curiosity I issued a challenge with the same Stockfish than a week old and this is the partial result ....

I75960x
Perfect book 2015t
time 3 '+ 0 "
TB 5 men syzygy
LP on for ChessRockers 1.0

ChessRockers 1.0 (free) Immagi10

conclusions:
a waste of time....


Use Normal 64

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
What's the elo of this engine?!

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) Emptychessrockers 1.1

more_horiz
Please post chessrockers 1.1 in 32 bits! Thank you. thumb up

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
Elo?

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
2500 games played with ChessRockers 1.0 (details below). Score 70.5%. Stockfish scored 71.5% in my latest testruns with the same conditions (http://spcc.beepworld.de ). So ChessRockers is a cheap clone of Stockfish, which is not stronger.
So, do not pay money for ChessRockers. It is a (stolen) peace of junk !!!

Code:


Games Completed = 2500 of 7000 (Avg game length = 188.742 sec)
Settings = Gauntlet/128MB/70000ms+700ms/M 450cp for 4 moves, D 110 moves/EPD:C:\LittleBlitzer\SALC_500.epd(500)
Time = 157845 sec elapsed, 284121 sec remaining
1.  ChessRockers 1.0 x64s     1762.0/2500 1291-267-942   (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=267) (D: r=498 i=128 f=54 s=7 a=255) (tpm=1525.4 d=20.97 nps=1730115)
2.  Komodo 9.2 x64           147.5/358 75-138-145   (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=138) (D: r=75 i=11 f=14 s=1 a=44) (tpm=1691.3 d=19.58 nps=1572494)
3.  Houdini 4 x64             132.0/357 64-157-136   (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=157) (D: r=42 i=27 f=8 s=2 a=57) (tpm=1610.0 d=17.44 nps=1948895)
4.  Gull 3 x64               97.0/357 21-184-152   (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=184) (D: r=82 i=23 f=9 s=1 a=37) (tpm=1732.6 d=16.19 nps=1804675)
5.  Critter 1.6a x64         95.0/357 35-202-120   (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=202) (D: r=75 i=16 f=6 s=1 a=22) (tpm=1750.9 d=16.83 nps=1955215)
6.  Fire 4 x64               90.0/357 22-199-136   (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=199) (D: r=75 i=16 f=6 s=1 a=38) (tpm=1771.1 d=15.58 nps=1624885)
7.  Mars 3.41 x64             90.5/357 28-204-125   (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=204) (D: r=77 i=12 f=4 s=1 a=31) (tpm=1840.9 d=17.26 nps=2047300)
8.  Equinox 3.3 x64           86.0/357 22-207-128   (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=207) (D: r=72 i=23 f=7 s=0 a=26) (tpm=1799.7 d=18.14 nps=1536957)

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
@pohl4711 wrote:
2500 games played with ChessRockers 1.0 (details below). Score 70.5%. Stockfish scored 71.5% in my latest testruns with the same conditions (http://spcc.beepworld.de ). So ChessRockers is a cheap clone of Stockfish, which is not stronger.
So, do not pay money for ChessRockers. It is a (stolen) peace of junk !!!



Thank you!
thumb up

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
Thank you for the advice, not that I was planning to part with any money for it! Cannot see why, or the point of anyone just changing settings on a known engine.

With regard to your testing Stockfish against the other engines, I am a little surprised that Komodo 9.2 should be lower than the 9.1, however I now note that your testing is done
using blitz settings so maybe that has some bearing on the matter.
As someone who needs my engines to help me work on my own games etc. blitz settings are just pointless, as I know how often all the engines can change 'their minds' given more
time to think.

descriptionChessRockers 1.0 (free) EmptyRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)

more_horiz
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum