ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Wed Nov 25, 2015 9:30 amRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Wed Nov 25, 2015 10:03 amRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Wed Nov 25, 2015 10:04 amRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Wed Nov 25, 2015 1:01 pmRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Wed Nov 25, 2015 1:11 pmRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Wed Nov 25, 2015 1:27 pmChessRockers 1.1 64 bitWed Nov 25, 2015 2:31 pm
Re: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Wed Nov 25, 2015 4:29 pm graciasRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Wed Nov 25, 2015 4:33 pmNot work the passwordWed Nov 25, 2015 5:22 pm
Re: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Wed Nov 25, 2015 5:44 pmRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Wed Nov 25, 2015 6:03 pm@pohl4711 wrote:Its obviously a Stockfish-derivative. But the testresults posted here are incredible (more than 63% against Komodo 9.2...) and suggest, that ChessRockers 1.0 is measureable stronger than the latest Stockfish-Dev.
I doubt that. But I will give ChessRockers 1.0 (64bit, Popcount) a try and play some thousand games with my SPCC test-conditions (http://spcc.beepworld.de ).
Then we will have a independent and valid result of ChessRockers 1.0. (Test of ChessRockers 1.1 will only follow, if ChessRockers 1.0 is really stronger than the latest Stockfish-Dev).
Stay tuned!
Re: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Wed Nov 25, 2015 6:13 pmRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Wed Nov 25, 2015 6:14 pm@Alexa1978 wrote:
analyzing the files of this "garbage" I found the 99.99999% of equality with Stockfish. Out of curiosity I issued a challenge with the same Stockfish than a week old and this is the partial result ....
I75960x
Perfect book 2015t
time 3 '+ 0 "
TB 5 men syzygy
LP on for ChessRockers 1.0
conclusions:
a waste of time....
Re: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Wed Nov 25, 2015 6:25 pm@pohl4711 wrote:friend, please let us know everything a boat it.....@Alexa1978 wrote:
analyzing the files of this "garbage" I found the 99.99999% of equality with Stockfish. Out of curiosity I issued a challenge with the same Stockfish than a week old and this is the partial result ....
I75960x
Perfect book 2015t
time 3 '+ 0 "
TB 5 men syzygy
LP on for ChessRockers 1.0
conclusions:
a waste of time....
OK. Thanx for this information. Because at the moment no functional patches of Stockfish are released, I have some free CPU-time. So it is no problem to play some thousand games with ChessRockers. Each new engine release should get one chance. I am a curious tester, too.
And 2000-3000 games will prove, if ChessRockers ist junk or a real progress.
Regards - Stefan
Re: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Thu Nov 26, 2015 12:20 amRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Thu Nov 26, 2015 5:37 am@Alexa1978 wrote:@pohl4711 wrote:Its obviously a Stockfish-derivative. But the testresults posted here are incredible (more than 63% against Komodo 9.2...) and suggest, that ChessRockers 1.0 is measureable stronger than the latest Stockfish-Dev.
I doubt that. But I will give ChessRockers 1.0 (64bit, Popcount) a try and play some thousand games with my SPCC test-conditions (http://spcc.beepworld.de ).
Then we will have a independent and valid result of ChessRockers 1.0. (Test of ChessRockers 1.1 will only follow, if ChessRockers 1.0 is really stronger than the latest Stockfish-Dev).
Stay tuned!
analyzing the files of this "garbage" I found the 99.99999% of equality with Stockfish. Out of curiosity I issued a challenge with the same Stockfish than a week old and this is the partial result ....
I75960x
Perfect book 2015t
time 3 '+ 0 "
TB 5 men syzygy
LP on for ChessRockers 1.0
conclusions:
a waste of time....
Re: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Thu Nov 26, 2015 7:31 pmchessrockers 1.1Thu Nov 26, 2015 8:02 pm Re: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Thu Nov 26, 2015 9:25 pmRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Fri Nov 27, 2015 9:35 amCode:
Games Completed = 2500 of 7000 (Avg game length = 188.742 sec)
Settings = Gauntlet/128MB/70000ms+700ms/M 450cp for 4 moves, D 110 moves/EPD:C:\LittleBlitzer\SALC_500.epd(500)
Time = 157845 sec elapsed, 284121 sec remaining
1. ChessRockers 1.0 x64s 1762.0/2500 1291-267-942 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=267) (D: r=498 i=128 f=54 s=7 a=255) (tpm=1525.4 d=20.97 nps=1730115)
2. Komodo 9.2 x64 147.5/358 75-138-145 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=138) (D: r=75 i=11 f=14 s=1 a=44) (tpm=1691.3 d=19.58 nps=1572494)
3. Houdini 4 x64 132.0/357 64-157-136 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=157) (D: r=42 i=27 f=8 s=2 a=57) (tpm=1610.0 d=17.44 nps=1948895)
4. Gull 3 x64 97.0/357 21-184-152 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=184) (D: r=82 i=23 f=9 s=1 a=37) (tpm=1732.6 d=16.19 nps=1804675)
5. Critter 1.6a x64 95.0/357 35-202-120 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=202) (D: r=75 i=16 f=6 s=1 a=22) (tpm=1750.9 d=16.83 nps=1955215)
6. Fire 4 x64 90.0/357 22-199-136 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=199) (D: r=75 i=16 f=6 s=1 a=38) (tpm=1771.1 d=15.58 nps=1624885)
7. Mars 3.41 x64 90.5/357 28-204-125 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=204) (D: r=77 i=12 f=4 s=1 a=31) (tpm=1840.9 d=17.26 nps=2047300)
8. Equinox 3.3 x64 86.0/357 22-207-128 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=207) (D: r=72 i=23 f=7 s=0 a=26) (tpm=1799.7 d=18.14 nps=1536957)
@pohl4711 wrote:2500 games played with ChessRockers 1.0 (details below). Score 70.5%. Stockfish scored 71.5% in my latest testruns with the same conditions (http://spcc.beepworld.de ). So ChessRockers is a cheap clone of Stockfish, which is not stronger.
So, do not pay money for ChessRockers. It is a (stolen) peace of junk !!!
Re: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)Fri Nov 27, 2015 6:00 pmRe: ChessRockers 1.0 (free)|
|
|