Chess2u
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Chess2uLog in

description3rd Fight for Place 1: SF vs. K9.3 started ... Empty3rd Fight for Place 1: SF vs. K9.3 started ...

more_horiz
http://www.amateurschach.de

Have fun!


News 235:

In each of the two test-runs 50 games Komodo 9.3 x64 vs. Stockfish 02Dec2015 BMI2 x64 = 100 games. To play are 2.050 + 50 games from the other test-run = 2.100 games ... and both engines are sync for future testing. The 3rd Fight for Place 1 need around 10 days, 4.200 games to play, around 425 per day can be play.

I set Komodo 9.3 x64 and Stockfish 02Dec2015 BMI2 x64 to 3.185 Elo. Maybe this could be the final result (think so).

Current Situation:

Code:

 "FCP Rating List"
 -----------------

 Date             : December 11th, 2015 (09:15)
 Games            : 149.650
 Version          : 3.39.L1-14.L2-25
 Hardware         : 2x Intel Core i7-4770K *4.0-4.3Ghz, 40/10 "repeatedly"
                    1x Intel Core i7-5930K *4.0-4.3Ghz, 40/10 "repeatedly"
 
 Calculation      : Ordo 1.0, "Naum 4.6 x64" with 2890 Elo / News 191
 Parameter        : Ordo_10.exe -a 2890 -A "Naum 4.6 x64" -p 1.pgn -o rating.txt -W -s1000 -D -E -V
 Conditions       : http://www.amateurschach.de/main/_conditions.htm
 

 
      Program                            Elo    +    -   Games   Score  Av.Op.  Draws
   1. Komodo 9.2 x64                     3174   14   14  2400    84.1%   2852   27.3%
   2. Stockfish 20Aug2015 BMI2 x64 C15   3162   14   14  2400    83.3%   2852   29.9%
   3. Houdini 4 STD B x64                3094   12   12  2550    77.2%   2856   31.3%
   4. Fire 4 x64                         3051   10   10  3300    72.4%   2859   36.8%
   5. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64             3043   10   10  3450    70.2%   2873   41.4%
   6. Equinox 3.30 x64                   2996   10   10  3250    66.2%   2863   42.7%
   7. Critter 1.6a x64                   2980   11   11  2550    64.4%   2866   46.1%
   8. Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64                2963   11   11  2650    63.8%   2853   43.1%
   9. Protector 1.9.0 x64                2951   11   11  2100    62.8%   2852   45.6%
  10. Nirvanachess 2.2 POP x64           2947   12   12  2150    62.1%   2854   45.3%
  11. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64                 2946   10   10  3000    60.1%   2867   44.8%
  12. Andscacs 0.83 POP x64              2923   12   12  2050    59.4%   2852   44.2%
  13. Texel 1.05 x64                     2906    9    9  3300    57.3%   2852   41.7%
  14. Hannibal 1.5 x64                   2905   10   10  3300    57.3%   2849   45.1%
  15. Chiron 2.0 x64                     2903    7    7  5650    60.4%   2823   39.3%
  16. Naum 4.6 x64                       2890    9    9  3900    58.6%   2824   42.6%
  17. Hakkapeliitta 3.0 x64              2840    8    8  4250    48.9%   2852   38.8%
  18. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64               2836    7    7  5650    52.2%   2824   40.9%
  19. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32                 2830    7    7  5650    51.5%   2824   42.1%
  20. Sjeng c't 2010 w32                 2810    9    9  3700    48.8%   2825   41.2%
  20. Fizbo 1.5 x64                      2810   10   10  2800    49.6%   2817   44.8%
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  22. Cheng 4.39 x64                     2802   10   10  3250    48.3%   2821   40.4%
  23. Shredder 12 x64                    2801    8    8  4850    46.3%   2837   40.7%
  24. Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64               2791    9    9  3650    47.8%   2814   40.2%
  25. Junior 13.3.00 x64                 2790    8    8  4950    46.6%   2823   39.7%
  26. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32               2786    8    8  4650    44.4%   2837   41.8%
  27. Booot 5.2.0 x64                    2780   11   11  2300    51.2%   2776   40.8%
  28. DiscoCheck 5.2.1 x64               2769    8    8  4250    43.8%   2825   37.9%
  29. iCE 2.0 v2240 POP x64              2767    7    7  5950    47.8%   2790   42.9%
  30. Quazar 0.4 x64                     2766    8    8  4800    43.3%   2827   40.8%
  31. Deuterium 14.3.34.130 POP x64      2764    8    8  4050    44.2%   2818   42.8%
  32. Spark 1.0 x64                      2760    7    7  6550    46.3%   2796   41.3%
  33. SmarThink 1.70 SSE3 x64            2757    7    7  5150    43.3%   2817   37.3%
  34. Alfil 15.04 C# Beta 24 x64         2755   11   11  2550    49.0%   2769   34.6%
  35. Zappa Mexico II x64                2749    8    8  4450    41.2%   2828   41.3%
  36. Thinker 5.4d Inert x64             2745    9    9  3700    41.5%   2820   40.0%
  37. TogaII 280513 Intel w32            2735   11   11  2050    48.6%   2745   41.6%
  38. Arasan 18.1 POP x64                2733   11   11  2200    46.4%   2762   41.8%
  39. Gaviota 1.0 AVX x64                2730    7    7  6650    42.3%   2798   37.4%
  40. Atlas 3.80 x64                     2726    9    9  3500    41.6%   2800   39.7%
  41. MinkoChess 1.3 JA POP x64          2719   10   10  3100    42.2%   2784   42.9%
  42. EXchess 7.71b x64                  2715   10   10  2550    43.8%   2769   41.5%
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  43. Rodent 1.7 Build 1 POP x64         2700   11   11  2500    45.0%   2737   43.6%
  43. Nemo 1.01 Beta POP x64             2700   10   10  2900    41.5%   2766   42.4%
  43. Pedone 1.2 BMI2 x64                2700   10   10  3100    36.5%   2816   41.4%
  46. Murka 3 x64                        2697   10   10  2500    43.2%   2748   46.6%
  47. GNU Chess5 5.60 x64                2682   11   11  2150    41.0%   2749   41.4%
  48. DisasterArea 1.54 x64              2680   10   10  2650    42.2%   2739   44.2%
  49. Tornado 7.15.05.04 x64             2675   10   10  2900    35.0%   2801   36.0%
  50. Scorpio 2.77 JA POP x64            2672   10   10  2550    38.1%   2764   38.6%
  51. Dirty 10APR2015 x64                2667   11   11  2450    38.2%   2757   39.5%
  52. Crafty 24.1 SSE42 x64              2661    9    9  3600    41.9%   2723   38.2%
  53. Glaurung 2.2 JA x64                2654    9    9  3350    40.6%   2725   41.9%
  54. Bobcat 6.4b x64                    2649   11   11  2400    36.3%   2754   40.4%
  55. The Baron 3.29 x64                 2644   11   11  2500    34.8%   2761   37.5%
  56. Octochess r5190 SSE4 x64           2639   10   10  3300    39.0%   2723   42.2%
  58. Rhetoric 1.4.1 x64                 2610   12   12  2000    31.9%   2763   35.8%
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  --. Godel 3.4.9 x64                    2598   16   16  1000    40.4%   2669   39.3%  
  --. Djinn 1.021 POP x64                2529   18   18  1000    31.2%   2672   36.6%
  --. ProDeo 2.00 w32                    2525   13   13  2050    22.7%   2750   30.5%



 Move average                : 176.52 / 88.260
 White advantage             : 39.04  +/- 0.70
 Draw rate (equal opponents) : 47.97% +/- 0.15
 
 Games        :  149650 (finished)
 White Wins   :   51775 (34.6%)
 Black Wins   :   37828 (25.3%)
 Draws        :   60047 (40.1%)
 Unfinished   :       0

 White Perf.  :  54.7%
 Black Perf.  :  45.3%

 ECO A        =  27922 games (18.7%)
 ECO B        =  35295 games (23.6%)
 ECO C        =  30108 games (20.1%)
 ECO D        =  29737 games (19.9%)
 ECO E        =  26588 games (17.8%)
 

description3rd Fight for Place 1: SF vs. K9.3 started ... EmptyFinal results ...

more_horiz
Hi there,

the final results can be found in my News 240 with different stats.

Games can be found under "Download games by Players"
Complete FCT database under "Downloads".

And of course, FCT Rating List and FCP Opening Book are updated too.

Statistics to middlegame, Transposition into endgame and endgame will be created a bit later today.

Frank's Chess Page
http://www.amateurschach.de

Best
Frank

description3rd Fight for Place 1: SF vs. K9.3 started ... EmptyNow the statistics are online!

more_horiz
Hi there,

Hi there,

have again a look in News 240.

Final opinion:
Komodo again stronger and more aggressive with many pieces on board. In endgame Stockfish have the advantage. With Stockfish and a small contemp vs. so many weaker opponents all should be more equal. I think both programs are on the same level. Komodo better with many pieces and Stockfish with lesser pieces on board.

But with all this statistics and the games you can build the own opinion.

Enough updates for today.

Frank's Chess Page
http://www.amateurschach.de

Best
Frank

description3rd Fight for Place 1: SF vs. K9.3 started ... EmptyRe: 3rd Fight for Place 1: SF vs. K9.3 started ...

more_horiz
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum