mr Hazsan thanks,
for first test (asmfish - stockfish no nnue)
i found 10 games lost on time (lost on time by stockfish)
please check 1st test, and without these 10 games, stockfish is better +19 elo
for your second test (asmfish - stockfish nnue)
11 games lost on time by stockfish, without lost games + 183 elo
in my computer test, no time loses by stockfish
Thank you very much for your correction and opinion...
My GUI setting is little bit different from many chess friends that they usually to set
Board setting :
my favorite setting to build a book
I always try to force to be maximum
Anyway, that is not the obvious best setting to apply
We need to consider several negative and positive impacts from it
(-) negative points:
>> It wiil take a long time. if we apply it to a real game, it will make our opponent or partner disapointed to wait
>> Sometimes, it will produce the most unwanted result. It will be a big disadvantage result for several engine that it's default setting is not the maximum one
(+) positive points:
>> The data that is produced will be quite good to take or learn for 'analyzers'
>> One of ways to break 'the deadlocked situation'
Once again, All the games that I played is only my fun experiment
Sometimes, 4-4-2 becomes a boring strategy to apply
Feel free if you have a new fresh idea that is good (at least) for yourself