@bookmaker wrote:and maybe you rename stockfish ... and do soemthing with stockfish source to be like.This way you can prove that every engine is stockfiish (just rename stockfish to this engine name).This not a prove i can  change few lines in Sf source to be like any engine you want.

this is your file friend, not my!
In this file there is the stockfish code, who do you want to make fun of?

how i can know that is my file,i should belive you maybe you are some hacker... and look you post some file and who will know is this not a renamed Stockfish , i can rename Stockfish to Houdini and prove this way that houdini is stockfish.So this is really a joke proving this way.

@bookmaker wrote:how i can know that is my file,i should belive you maybe you are some hacker... and look you post some file and who will know is this not a renamed Stockfish , i can rename Stockfish to Houdini and prove this way that houdini is stockfish.So this is really a joke proving this way.

you are crazy, this is simply your file after removing the obfuscation that you put with upx. Don't try to climb the mirrors, you are only ridiculous.

this is your file i dont posted it and SF source you modify to look like this one and you claim its my file ,you are operating some reverse enginered stuff like hackers do so i dont think you r opinion as reliable,maybe try to reverse some other programs,i can told you how to do it.just rename the SF sorce to this engine name and then claim its Stockfish.

you're just a jester who was caught with the stolen lollipop in his hand ...

you are just claiming what you want but look,you claimed firstly that file is protected .i f want to protect this file you will never decrypt this.And funny thing you post a prove that it just cant be renamed Stockfish ,this screenshot with similarity test.So you are slightly schizofrenical because if you claim as you do its a Stockfish, similarity test should show about 99% not 56.

this is your file

@bookmaker wrote:you are just claiming what you want but look,you claimed firstly that file is protected .i f want to protect this file you will never decrypt this.And funny thing you post a prove that it just cant be renamed Stockfish ,this screenshot with similarity test.So you are slightly schizofrenical because if you claim as you do its a Stockfish, similarity test should show about 99% not 56.

Try it and you will make another poor figure ... whatever obfuscator you can use know that I can bring the file back to the original (as in this case). I have unmasked the author of Synapse, I have unmasked Zerbinati when he published Hypnos, and now I have unmasked you too ...
Do not waste time doing these tricks, everyone knows that a pinco pallino coming from nowhere can never be the genius who pulls a super engine out of the cylinder at its debut. So you offend the years of work done by real programmers! In the first release you forgot to remove the "d" and "eval" commands from stockfish (and I caught you!), Then immediately you posted a new file with these commands disabled but you forgot to change the timestamp (which for stockfish It's always the same!). Now you try to climb on the mirrors, you are simply ridiculous!
P.S.
Regarding the simtest, I remember that Zerbinati in Hypnos had modified some strings of stockfish, bringing the engine to a much lower percentage than this, so the fact that you are at 56.57% means that you have not committed enough in the camouflage!

now enough is enough though, I have wasted too much time with your magic experiments! I greet you super programmer!

if you read carefully more about this test you will discover something http://rebel13.nl/misc/sim2019.html ...it's obvious that all powerful engines are of origin Stockfish ,and you think it's a new discovery like aliens on Mars

I think our Polish friend bookmakerowicz and his sock puppet accounts has proven one thing: how easy it is to get chess engine enthusiasts to run any old obfuscated executable on their computer.

@dkappe wrote:I think our Polish friend bookmakerowicz and his sock puppet accounts has proven one thing: how easy it is to get chess engine enthusiasts to run any old obfuscated executable on their computer.

experimenting, modifying and maybe improving something that already exists is always a positive thing ... you just need to tell the truth!

@dkappe wrote:I think our Polish friend bookmakerowicz and his sock puppet accounts has proven one thing: how easy it is to get chess engine enthusiasts to run any old obfuscated executable on their computer.

you germans have always problems with nationality its your major argument.So what that polish this means just nationality which you like too punch as in the history,you are always the same.

Alexa wrote:experimenting, modifying and maybe improving something that already exists is always a positive thing ... you just need to tell the truth!

yes modification is allowed so what is your problem

you germans have always problems with nationality its your major argument.So what that polish this means just nationality which you like too punch as in the history,you are always the same.

I live in the second largest Polish city in the world which means — surprise! — that I’m not German. :-) But you, sir, are still a troll.

and what you are doing in this city , spying for govs or what ... ok i just logoff and take a break from this discussion.

@dkappe wrote:This is my second request for the source code as required by the GPLv3 that governs both SF and lc0.

That sounds like an "ultimatum" ...
I do not know what you have with "bookmaker" and what you expect from him ...
Leave the hell alone and see for yourself !

Is it established in "GPLv3" that he must post the "src" after 3 hours, 5 days or after a week ? NOT !
So he can post it tomorrow, over a month, a year or never. Dot!

This is exactly what Khalid Omar, the author of "Eman", did.
Everyone jumped on him to post the "src" and he did not want with that just ...

Continue "bookmaker" look at your job and do not pay attention to "all dogs that bark".

@dkappe wrote:It doesn’t matter how the engine plays, only if it’s derived from GPL code and you are distributing it. So, either provide the code or stop distributing it.

Ha ha ha! The police appeared, be careful that he fines you !
Take your order no more !
See yourself by your sheep and give peace to others to see their own.

@Alexa1978 wrote:

@bookmaker wrote:you are just claiming what you want but look,you claimed firstly that file is protected .i f want to protect this file you will never decrypt this.And funny thing you post a prove that it just cant be renamed Stockfish ,this screenshot with similarity test.So you are slightly schizofrenical because if you claim as you do its a Stockfish, similarity test should show about 99% not 56.

Try it and you will make another poor figure ... whatever obfuscator you can use know that I can bring the file back to the original (as in this case). I have unmasked the author of Synapse, I have unmasked Zerbinati when he published Hypnos, and now I have unmasked you too ...
Do not waste time doing these tricks, everyone knows that a pinco pallino coming from nowhere can never be the genius who pulls a super engine out of the cylinder at its debut. So you offend the years of work done by real programmers! In the first release you forgot to remove the "d" and "eval" commands from stockfish (and I caught you!), Then immediately you posted a new file with these commands disabled but you forgot to change the timestamp (which for stockfish It's always the same!). Now you try to climb on the mirrors, you are simply ridiculous!
P.S.
Regarding the simtest, I remember that Zerbinati in Hypnos had modified some strings of stockfish, bringing the engine to a much lower percentage than this, so the fact that you are at 56.57% means that you have not committed enough in the camouflage!

Stop misinforming the world !
Similarity test should show about 70% not 56!
Yes, this must be the percentage to claim that one program is a clone of another program, say specialists and programmers not me.

To be more informed - everyone from this forum on this topic - here you have a material where you can find out more about cloning / plagiarism, etc.

https://openload.cc/L0cbb5Q0ne/The_myth_Rajlich_copied_Fruit_pdf

I already answered, if you want to understand my point well, otherwise everyone goes their own way...

@ZamChess wrote:
Stop misinforming the world !
Similarity test should show about 70% not 56!
Yes, this must be the percentage to claim that one program is a clone of another program, say specialists and programmers not me.

To be more informed - everyone from this forum on this topic - here you have a material where you can find out more about cloning / plagiarism, etc.

https://openload.cc/L0cbb5Q0ne/The_myth_Rajlich_copied_Fruit_pdf

@Alexa1978 wrote:
experimenting, modifying and maybe improving something that already exists is always a positive thing ... you just need to tell the truth!

Hello bookMaker

The engine is very strong but still not working in Infinity Chess. At least for me. The GUI simply does not install the engine and freezes

Please, keep up with your hard work

Thanks in advance

maybe it also works if you install it as a ctg engine. For me works then.
@ bookmaker, thanks for this engine. It plays not bad.
Does she have a learning function?

Thanks for your suggestion but the fact is IC does not let me even create the engine

I see the server is down

Re: Alpha subZero - NN for CPU
Post on Fri Jan 24, 2020 6:59 am by
PooperScooper
https://www.dropbox.com/s/cb26fk2rgh9r76b/alpha%20subzero%20190.1.rar?dl=0


Download link not working..file corrupted error...7 zip....01-28-20 Need new file and download link...Thx kc

New Version 310.1

-added multiple book management
-customized power play (from begginer to world champion)
-customized style of play (Option Active)
-simplified options

screenshots:







https://gofile.io/?c=sXek2k

Hello bookmaker, this link is not working for me. Could you please offer another link?

Thanks in advance