Chess2u
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Chess2uLog in

Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyFire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
any news about Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme? :sm35:

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
Not yet.

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
i like Fire engine :sm1:

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
Fire xTreme good name clap

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
download link for the f 1.1 w32 ?

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
firebird 1.1
http://www.chesslogik.com/downloads/FireBird_11_w32.rar
http://www.chesslogik.com/downloads/FireBird_11_x64.rar
http://www.chesslogik.com/downloads/...x64_popcnt.rar
http://www.chesslogik.com/downloads/...32_no_SSE2.rar
thumb up

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
thanks

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
@wahyu wrote:


links not working.. plz upload into some mirror... thank u

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
firebird 1.1
mediafire.com ?tljdlwjrjji

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
Fire xTreme :sm10:

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
:evil:

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
no news yet about Fire xTreme :sm6:

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
Bodyguard wrote:
no news yet about Fire xTreme :sm6:

:sm59:
kranium :sm35:
my favorite engine :sm1:

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? Emptyfire 1.1 32

more_horiz
Vinyan wrote:
Fire 1.1 w32 with the Dr. Wael Deeb settings is the Nr1 Engine in the world!

The Dr. Wael Deeb settings:

Pawn Hash: 64
Pawn Value: 120
Knight Value: 325
Bishop Value: 325
Rook Value: 600
Queen Value: 1170
Bishop Pair Value: 65
Verification Reduction: 8

With these settings FireBird 1.1 w32 ( the strongest Fire engine) is in good condition.
In my personal tests FireBird is approximately 35 elo stronger than Deep Rybka 4 32bit !

I feel a lot of elo is saved for the rental version of Rybka, so Vasik Rajlich did not care much
about this Rybka 4, what a shame.



is above setting good for w64? :sm67:

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
Theoretically, this settings is wrong because:
1- Pawn Hash Is not a constant value in all cases
2- in this settings,
Knight 325 + Bishop 325 ≈ Almost equal with Rook 600
so this you will see much in the endgame Knight + Bishop Vs Rook
anyway you must test this settings very well to know if good or not

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
Bodyguard wrote:
no news yet about Fire xTreme :sm6:

:sm15:

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
@Ahmed wrote:
Theoretically, this settings is wrong because:
1- Pawn Hash Is not a constant value in all cases
2- in this settings,
Knight 325 + Bishop 325 ≈ Almost equal with Rook 600
so this you will see much in the endgame Knight + Bishop Vs Rook
anyway you must test this settings very well to know if good or not

i agree :sm29:

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
Oz wrote:
Bodyguard wrote:
no news yet about Fire xTreme :sm6:

:sm15:

Perhaps kranium he want some suspense, he did not even give a probabilistic Time for release

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
@Ahmed wrote:
Theoretically, this settings is wrong because:
1- Pawn Hash Is not a constant value in all cases
2- in this settings,
Knight 325 + Bishop 325 ≈ Almost equal with Rook 600
so this you will see much in the endgame Knight + Bishop Vs Rook
anyway you must test this settings very well to know if good or not


Theoretically are wrong but practically are still toping my rating list....IvanHoe T0.7 & IvanHoe 52aF are getting close and most probably will surpass my settings but I am ok with that 8)
Dr.D

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
@Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
@Ahmed wrote:
Theoretically, this settings is wrong because:
1- Pawn Hash Is not a constant value in all cases
2- in this settings,
Knight 325 + Bishop 325 ≈ Almost equal with Rook 600
so this you will see much in the endgame Knight + Bishop Vs Rook
anyway you must test this settings very well to know if good or not


Theoretically are wrong but practically are still toping my rating list....IvanHoe T0.7 & IvanHoe 52aF are getting close and most probably will surpass my settings but I am ok with that 8)
Dr.D

hi, you have rating list ?

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
Victor wrote:
@Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
@Ahmed wrote:
Theoretically, this settings is wrong because:
1- Pawn Hash Is not a constant value in all cases
2- in this settings,
Knight 325 + Bishop 325 ≈ Almost equal with Rook 600
so this you will see much in the endgame Knight + Bishop Vs Rook
anyway you must test this settings very well to know if good or not


Theoretically are wrong but practically are still toping my rating list....IvanHoe T0.7 & IvanHoe 52aF are getting close and most probably will surpass my settings but I am ok with that 8)
Dr.D

hi, you have rating list ?


Hi,
Yes,and a big one by that,I've been building it since 2002....
I intend to make a web page soon and publish my rating list....
Dr.D

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
Good luck

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
@Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
@Ahmed wrote:
Theoretically, this settings is wrong because:
1- Pawn Hash Is not a constant value in all cases
2- in this settings,
Knight 325 + Bishop 325 ≈ Almost equal with Rook 600
so this you will see much in the endgame Knight + Bishop Vs Rook
anyway you must test this settings very well to know if good or not


Theoretically are wrong but practically are still toping my rating list....IvanHoe T0.7 & IvanHoe 52aF are getting close and most probably will surpass my settings but I am ok with that 8)
Dr.D

Nice Work but Take look at Frank rating list SWCR

Code:

08. IPP Fire 1.31 x64            2.900 21 20  920 75% 2.720 36%
09. IPP FireBird 1.1 x64 WD      2.897 20 19  920 73% 2.736 41%

http://ahmed-chess.forumotion.com/tournaments-matches-and-rating-lists-room-f6/swcr-after-61120-games-t396.htm

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
@Ahmed wrote:
@Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
@Ahmed wrote:
Theoretically, this settings is wrong because:
1- Pawn Hash Is not a constant value in all cases
2- in this settings,
Knight 325 + Bishop 325 ≈ Almost equal with Rook 600
so this you will see much in the endgame Knight + Bishop Vs Rook
anyway you must test this settings very well to know if good or not


Theoretically are wrong but practically are still toping my rating list....IvanHoe T0.7 & IvanHoe 52aF are getting close and most probably will surpass my settings but I am ok with that 8)
Dr.D

Nice Work but Take look at Frank rating list SWCR

Code:

08. IPP Fire 1.31 x64            2.900 21 20  920 75% 2.720 36%
09. IPP FireBird 1.1 x64 WD      2.897 20 19  920 73% 2.736 41%

http://ahmed-chess.forumotion.com/tournaments-matches-and-rating-lists-room-f6/swcr-after-61120-games-t396.htm


Yes Ahmed,I'm aware of Frank's testing results,but I test at longer time controls and stronger hardware and hence the difference in results....
Dr.D

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
Okay Wael, All the Best!

descriptionFire 1.4/Fire xTreme? EmptyRe: Fire 1.4/Fire xTreme?

more_horiz
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum