AlexChess wrote:deeds wrote:For whose in denial of reality :
An engine that learns it's smarter than an engine that searches in vain.
A book that improves the WDL ratio it's smarter than tens of thousands games to reduce the error margin.
Tablebases that solve a fraction of chess it's smarter than engines that analyze the same positions over and over again.
They play ten thousand games to reduce the error margin on ELO calculation, not to improve the WDL ratio.
But I prefer to play a fraction of games at a decent depth using all 8 CPUs instead of playing 8 games using only 1 CPU simply to say "I have played 4000 games (full of blunders) . I'm very professional"
LOL..Don't embarrass yourself anymore, stop saying bullshit.. You have 0 idea about what you are saying..
It will be much better if you tell everyone what diagnosis the psychiatrist has given you.. LOL..
Although no, i changed my mind, don't stop talking, we want to laugh even more.