Mars

@mcdiniz wrote:

tks.. majortom... some improvement strength in Elo? ...

My 120"+2" test is not completed yet:

@majortom wrote:

Mars 2.0 x64

Fast 24 hours Test of Mars 2 against Fire 3. 1000 games (500 opening-positions, repeated, 70''+700ms, 1 core, no ponder, i7-2630QM-notebook (2.0 GHz).

Mars 2 -Fire 3: 503-497 (+174 -168 =658)

Nice result. Older Mars-versions scored below 45% against Fire 3 in my tests...


Stefan

Few elo added:
Mars 2.1 x64

@pohl4711 wrote:

@majortom wrote:

Mars 2.0 x64

Fast 24 hours Test of Mars 2 against Fire 3. 1000 games (500 opening-positions, repeated, 70''+700ms, 1 core, no ponder, i7-2630QM-notebook (2.0 GHz).

Mars 2 -Fire 3: 503-497 (+174 -168 =658)

Nice result. Older Mars-versions scored below 45% against Fire 3 in my tests...


Stefan

Thanx Stefan for the test!

First results of new version:

TimeControl "120+2":

[pgn][Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2014.07.14"]
[Round "7"]
[White "Stockfish 190514 64 SSE4.2"]
[Black "Mars 2.1"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "E81"]
[Opening "King's Indian"]
[Variation "Sämisch, 5...O-O 6.Be3 Nbd7 7.Qd2 c5 8.Nge2 a6"]
[TimeControl "120+2"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "128"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]

1. d4 {book} d6 {book} 2. e4 {book} Nf6 {book} 3. f3 {book} e5 {book} 4. d5
{book} Be7 {book} 5. Be3 {book} Nh5 {book} 6. c4 {book} Bg5 {book} 7. Bf2
{book} g6 {book} 8. Nc3 {book} O-O {book} 9. g4 {+0.40/22 8.4s} Nf4
{-0.25/20 5.9s} 10. h4 {+0.39/24 3.1s} Bh6 {-0.39/20 25s} 11. Nge2
{+0.34/22 6.6s} c5 {-0.39/19 6.8s} 12. g5 {+0.58/18 5.3s} Bg7 {-0.21/17
0.098s} 13. Qd2 {+0.67/18 6.2s} Nd7 {-0.30/17 1.6s} 14. O-O-O {+0.81/20
25s} Nh5 {-0.31/17 1.8s} 15. Ng3 {+0.63/21 17s} Nf4 {-0.31/18 1.9s} 16. Kb1
{+0.59/21 18s} a6 {-0.31/18 6.4s} 17. Nge2 {+0.59/20 2.3s} Nh5 {-0.16/16
5.7s} 18. b3 {+0.60/19 2.3s} Rb8 {-0.15/16 7.2s} 19. Ng3 {+0.45/18 5.3s}
Nf4 {0.00/14 0.047s} 20. Be3 {+0.58/20 3.8s} Re8 {-0.08/16 4.4s} 21. Qh2
{+1.21/18 4.0s} b6 {-0.18/16 7.4s} 22. Rc1 {+1.19/19 7.7s} Qe7 {-0.26/16
4.3s} 23. Rc2 {+1.26/19 8.0s} b5 {-0.41/16 4.5s} 24. cxb5 {+1.85/19 4.4s}
axb5 {-0.40/16 1.3s} 25. Nxb5 {+1.86/19 7.3s} Nb6 {-0.59/16 8.1s} 26. h5
{+1.99/16 3.1s} c4 {-0.79/16 3.1s} 27. bxc4 {+2.02/16 6.0s} Bd7 {-0.82/17
16s} 28. Rb2 {+1.61/17 6.3s} Na4 {-0.83/17 5.3s} 29. Rb3 {+1.67/18 3.4s}
Rec8 {-1.05/16 14s} 30. hxg6 {+1.77/18 5.7s} hxg6 {-1.06/16 3.6s} 31. Ne2
{+1.18/20 7.3s} Bxb5 {-1.06/16 1.9s} 32. cxb5 {+1.28/19 4.2s} Qxg5
{-0.69/18 11s} 33. b6 {+1.50/16 2.5s} Qf6 {-0.13/16 7.7s} 34. Ka1 {+0.98/17
2.0s} Nc5 {0.00/15 5.3s} 35. Rb5 {+1.13/16 2.0s} Ncd3 {0.00/16 2.6s} 36.
Kb1 {+1.17/17 2.0s} Ne1 {+0.01/16 3.8s} 37. Ng1 {+0.41/17 2.0s} Nc2
{+0.19/15 1.4s} 38. Bc1 {+0.12/18 2.0s} Nd4 {+1.36/15 2.3s} 39. Rb2
{0.00/17 1.9s} Nxd5 {+1.36/13 0.005s} 40. Ba6 {-0.06/18 2.1s} Rc6 {+2.49/15
4.1s} 41. Bd3 {-1.79/17 2.0s} Nf4 {+2.49/13 0.007s} 42. Bxf4 {-2.42/19
2.0s} exf4 {+4.36/10 0.47s} 43. b7 {-8.72/19 2.0s} Nc2 {+8.26/14 0.69s} 44.
Qh7+ {-9.72/20 1.7s} Kf8 {+8.26/12 0.001s} 45. Qxg7+ {-10.22/22 2.3s} Kxg7
{+9.64/13 0.69s} 46. Bxc2 {-10.47/23 2.0s} Qc3 {+9.64/12 0s} 47. Ne2
{-10.76/22 2.0s} Qxf3 {+11.16/14 1.6s} 48. Rh2 {-10.96/21 1.7s} Qf1+
{+11.16/12 0s} 49. Nc1 {-11.10/22 2.1s} f3 {+11.44/14 0.92s} 50. Rd2
{-12.57/20 2.2s} f2 {+12.22/14 0.62s} 51. e5 {-13.20/22 2.0s} Qg1
{+11.85/11 0.004s} 52. Rxf2 {-14.42/21 1.8s} Qxf2 {+12.74/13 0.58s} 53. Ba4
{-15.51/21 2.2s} Rb6 {+12.95/11 0.003s} 54. Bb3 {-16.42/22 2.1s} Qf5+
{+16.94/13 1.2s} 55. Rc2 {-18.58/23 2.0s} Rc6 {+16.94/12 0s} 56. Ne2
{-105.82/26 2.0s} Rxc2 {+M33/13 1.9s} 57. Nd4 {-110.51/18 2.0s} Rc1+
{+M21/17 1.4s} 58. Kxc1 {-M18/17 2.0s} Qf4+ {+M15/15 0.84s} 59. Kb1
{-M16/18 1.1s} Qxd4 {+M13/16 3.1s} 60. a4 {-M10/22 1.9s} Qd2 {+M9/17 3.3s}
61. Bd5 {-M8/100 3.0s} Rh8 {+M7/16 0.64s} 62. a5 {-M6/120 0.027s} Rh2
{+M5/17 3.1s} 63. Bg2 {-M4/120 0.007s} Rxg2 {+M3/17 0.59s} 64. a6 {-M2/120
0.032s} Qd1# {+M1/128 0.047s, Black mates} 0-1
[/pgn]

Last edited by majortom on Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:17 pm; edited 1 time in total

hum.. good game... marjortom when we can have a hand .. to be able to test? ... will do soon my particular tournament ... your engine would be very welcome ... best

@mcdiniz wrote:

hum.. good game... marjortom when we can have a hand .. to be able to test? ... will do soon my particular tournament ... your engine would be very welcome ... best

That game was played by Mars 2.1, follow the link:
http://treu.ru/mars/Mars_2.1_x64.7z

Thanks majortom.

Few elo added:

Mars 2.2 x64

Mars 2.2 looks very strong in test still early but this engine is strong!  

Few elo added:

Mars 2.5 x64

Majortom, Mars x64 gauntlet will start 2/3 days after BooksWar 11 is finished. Be Ready with the final version.

Vladimir wrote:

Majortom, Mars x64 gauntlet will start 2/3 days after BooksWar 11 is finished. Be Ready with the final version.

Vladimir, we are ready and we are waiting for:

Mars 2.6 x64

Mars 2.7 x64

TC 30"+1"





Games

@majortom wrote:

Vladimir wrote:

Majortom, Mars x64 gauntlet will start 2/3 days after BooksWar 11 is finished. Be Ready with the final version.

Vladimir, we are ready and we are waiting for:

Mars 2.6 x64

Which one is the final version?

Vladimir wrote:

@majortom wrote:

Vladimir wrote:

Majortom, Mars x64 gauntlet will start 2/3 days after BooksWar 11 is finished. Be Ready with the final version.

Vladimir, we are ready and we are waiting for:

Mars 2.6 x64

Which one is the final version?

I think the last one - Mars 2.7  

@pohl4711 wrote:

@majortom wrote:

Mars 2.0 x64

Fast 24 hours Test of Mars 2 against Fire 3. 1000 games (500 opening-positions, repeated, 70''+700ms, 1 core, no ponder, i7-2630QM-notebook (2.0 GHz).

Mars 2 -Fire 3: 503-497 (+174 -168 =658)

Nice result. Older Mars-versions scored below 45% against Fire 3 in my tests...


Stefan

Hello Stefan, are you planning to add Mars 2.7 in your tournament? please give me a link to your list.

waelsae wrote:

@pohl4711 wrote:

@majortom wrote:

Mars 2.0 x64

Fast 24 hours Test of Mars 2 against Fire 3. 1000 games (500 opening-positions, repeated, 70''+700ms, 1 core, no ponder, i7-2630QM-notebook (2.0 GHz).

Mars 2 -Fire 3: 503-497 (+174 -168 =658)

Nice result. Older Mars-versions scored below 45% against Fire 3 in my tests...


Stefan

Hello Stefan, are you planning to add Mars 2.7 in your tournament? please give me a link to your list.

I am doing a small tournament with Mars 2.7 and some other Ippolit-derivatives at the moment. Will take some days.

For a rankinglist-result of Mars (2.2) and PanChess 00.611 take a look at Andreas Strangmüllers excellent website/bullet-ratinglist: http://fastgm.de/60+0.60%20-%20Universal.html
There you will see, that the new PanChess is no progress and Mars 2.2 is a regression (related to Mars 1)

Regards - Stefan

Mars 2.7 x64 Gauntlet (finished)
https://www.chess2u.com/t8642p15-mars-tests#58877


https://www.chess2u.com/t6886p45-engineswar-rating-list#58879

Mars 2.8 x64

Mars 3.0 x64

Mars 3.0 is keeping pace with the latest Stockfish in my testing. Thanks for this great engine. 

Mars 3.1 x64

dear majortom...some estimate of gain in ELO relation to the Mars 2.8/3.0?.. best