there is chess puzzle of the day which is amazing
and I thought perhaps there could be chess tactics and strategies of the week which could be informative
Chess Tactics and Strategies of the Week could be made by anyone I guess
so if there is somebody who has a good tactic to show
anyone can write I guess
cuz I think if there are more ppl who are writing about some things
the better
(by the way,
it is like the following thought
if there is one person who is running a tourney
it is not easy to run 1000 matches
but 10 ppl just run 100 rounds
and we combine the results
then we can get 1000 matches very quickly (from 10 ppl's collaboration)
so I guess anyone can write about the tactics and strategies)
it is like the cloud
and I'm not 100% sure but even stockfish testing framework is based on the cloud perhaps
it is not easy to have one very powerful supercomputer
so there are many computers which are interconnected and correlated with each other on the net via cloud concept
so if there are 100 computers with 8 cores which are connected thru cloud
it is like they have "one" giant supercomputer
with 800 cores working in tendum with others
and that's something!
***
so I'll do this "Chess Tactics and Strategies of the Week"
I can write as many as 10 posts a week I guess
or as little as a few posts a week I think
but here is the thing
I'll not write about a tactic or a strategy
which I read or saw from a book or something like those published materials
for chess learners and chess students
that were made by other ppl
I'll post tactics and strategies that are made by me running a tourney
so I'll watch a plethora of multifarious engine Vs. engine matches
and if I find a really good match (tactically and strategically)
between engines
then I'll post the pgn of the match
along with some key points!
***
the following is one example of such method

the detailed explanation:
https://www.chess2u.com/t7683-amazing-rare-match-rare-showing-of-resilience-by-stockfish
so if I find a really amazing match between engines
like the above aforementioned illustration
I can post the pgn with some diagrams
and comments!
***
the first strategy:

pawn pushing followed by knight capture!
[pgn][Event "Computer Chess Game"]
[Site "USER01"]
[Date "2013.10.14"]
[Round "120"]
[White "Stockfish 091013"]
[Black "Houdini 3 Pro w32"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[TimeControl "60/60"]
[Annotator "17. +0.18 17... +0.12"]
1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. dxc5 Nc6 6. c3 e6 7. Be3 a6 8.
Nbd2 Nxe5 9. h3 Bxf3 10. Nxf3 Nxf3+ 11. Qxf3 Nf6 12. Bd3 Nd7 13. b4 a5 14.
O-O Be7 15. a3 Bf6 16. Bd4 O-O 17. Bc2 {+0.18/16 2.7} e5 {+0.12/15 4} 18.
Qd3 {+0.48/17 1.0} e4 {+0.12/13} 19. Qb5 {+0.42/19 1.5} Qc7 {+0.11/13 1.7}
20. f3 {+0.50/18 1.4} exf3 {+0.23/14 1.4} 21. Qd3 {+0.64/17 1.1} Bxd4+
{+0.23/13} 22. cxd4 {+0.64/17 1.3} Nf6 {+0.22/12 1.0} 23. Qxf3
{+0.44/17 1.1} axb4 {+0.27/15 2.3} 24. axb4 {+0.60/17 1.1} Rxa1
{+0.30/16 1.7} 25. Rxa1 {+0.74/15 0.3} Re8 {+0.24/17 2.6} 26. b5
{+0.75/15 1.1} h6 {+0.38/17 1.4} 27. Ra3 {+0.82/19 6} Re1+ {+0.26/15 1.0}
28. Kf2 {+0.66/19 1.1} Re8 {+0.14/16 1.1} 29. Ra7 {+0.92/18 1.4} Qc8
{+0.26/14 2.4} 30. b6 {+1.21/17 1.2} Re7 {+0.30/16 1.1} 31. Bf5
{+1.51/18 1.6} Qe8 {+0.25/16 1.0} 32. Qa3 {+1.54/19 1.1} Qb5 {+0.47/14 1.0}
33. Ra8+ {+1.57/20 1.4} Re8 {+0.78/16 3} 34. Rxe8+ {+1.57/19 1.3} Qxe8
{+0.80/16 1.1} 35. Qg3 {+1.91/18 1.3} g6 {+0.53/16 2.3} 36. Qe5
{+1.55/19 2.6} Qc6 {+0.78/17 7} 37. Bc2 {+1.59/19 1.2} Nd7 {+0.82/16 4} 38.
Qc7 {+2.30/18 1.1} Qf6+ {+0.82/15} 39. Ke2 {+2.38/20 1.4} Qxd4
{-1.20/14 0.7} 40. Qxd7 {+2.52/17 0.6} Qe5+ {+0.74/16 1.0} 41. Kd3
{+2.52/17 1.2} Qg3+ {-1.17/16 2.9} 42. Kd4 {+2.60/18 1.2} Qf4+
{-1.17/15 0.6} 43. Kc3 {+2.60/19 0.3} Qc4+ {-1.39/16 2.9} 44. Kb2
{+2.60/20 0.5} Qb4+ {-1.50/15 0.7} 45. Ka2 {+2.60/18 1.4} d4 {-1.78/15 2.6}
46. Qe8+ {+3.03/17 1.0} Kg7 {-1.50/14} 47. Qe5+ {+2.88/19 1.5} Kh7
{-1.53/15 0.5} 48. Qg3 {+2.94/20 1.4} d3 {-1.48/15 0.4} 49. Qxd3
{+2.96/20 1.3} Qxc5 {-1.47/15} 50. Bb3 {+3.03/20 1.3} Qa5+ {-1.09/14 0.5}
51. Kb2 {+3.03/19 0.8} Qxb6 {-1.58/14 0.6} 52. Qd5 {+3.15/20 0.9} Qf2+
{-1.54/16 0.6} 53. Kc3 {+2.98/20 1.4} Qf6+ {-1.57/16 0.5} 54. Kd3
{+3.31/18 0.9} Qf1+ {-1.54/16 1.0} 55. Ke3 {+3.35/20 1.5} Qe1+
{-1.58/17 0.6} 56. Kf3 {+3.35/21 1.3} Qf1+ {-1.59/17 0.5} 57. Kg3
{+3.41/22 1.3} Kg7 {-1.65/15 0.6} 58. Qxb7 {+3.41/21 1.4} Qe1+
{-1.37/15 0.5} 59. Kf3 {+3.47/19 1.5} Qf1+ {-1.63/17 0.7} 60. Ke3
{+3.53/18 1.3} Qe1+ {-1.72/16 0.8} 61. Kd3 {+3.51/19 2.2} Qf1+
{-1.61/18 0.9} 62. Kd4 {+3.53/21 1.2} Qg1+ {-1.56/18 1.0} 63. Kc4
{+3.53/22 1.2} Qf1+ {-1.67/18 3} 64. Kb4 {+3.53/21 1.8} Qe1+ {-1.77/18 4}
65. Ka4 {+3.53/20 2.6} Qa1+ {-1.81/18 3} 66. Kb5 {+3.57/15 0.4} Qf1+
{-1.79/18 2.3} 67. Bc4 {+3.63/18 1.1} Qb1+ {-1.74/18 0.8} 68. Kc6
{+3.65/19 1.6} Qe4+ {-1.74/18 2.3} 69. Bd5 {+3.71/20 1.2} Qc2+
{-1.77/17 0.8} 70. Kd6 {+3.73/19 1.3} Qf2 {-1.82/18 1.8} 71. Qb4
{+3.65/21 2.8} Qf6+ {-1.81/15 0.9} 72. Kc7 {+3.65/20 1.4} h5 {-1.89/16 2.8}
73. Qe4 {+3.75/20 1.3} Qc3+ {-1.72/16 0.7} 74. Kd7 {+3.75/20 1.3} Qb2
{-1.78/16 0.6} 75. Qe3 {+3.75/20 1.3} Qb5+ {-1.78/14 0.6} 76. Bc6
{+3.77/21 1.2} Qf5+ {-1.83/17 1.0} 77. Kd6 {+3.73/22 1.1} Qf6+
{-1.79/17 0.6} 78. Kc5 {+3.73/22 1.2} Kh7 {-1.81/17 0.6} 79. Bf3
{+3.81/16 1.4} Qa6 {-1.85/16 0.8} 80. Qd4 {+3.79/16 1.2} Qa3+
{-1.84/17 0.9} 81. Kc6 {+3.75/18 1.0} Qa6+ {-1.83/18 0.7} 82. Kc7
{+3.79/20 0.9} Qe6 {-1.95/17 1.1} 83. Kd8 {+3.79/20 1.1} Kg8 {-1.96/17 0.6}
84. Bb7 {+3.81/18 1.4} Qf5 {-2.08/16 0.6} 85. Bd5 {+3.83/20 0.7} Qg5+
{-1.94/17 0.6} 86. Kd7 {+3.83/21 0.9} Qf5+ {-1.94/18 1.2} 87. Kc6
{+3.75/18 0.6} Qc8+ {-1.85/16 0.8} 88. Kb5 {+3.81/20 0.7} Qe8+
{-1.85/17 0.7}
{Xboard adjudication: 50-move rule} 1/2-1/2[/pgn]
and I thought perhaps there could be chess tactics and strategies of the week which could be informative
Chess Tactics and Strategies of the Week could be made by anyone I guess
so if there is somebody who has a good tactic to show
anyone can write I guess
cuz I think if there are more ppl who are writing about some things
the better
(by the way,
it is like the following thought
if there is one person who is running a tourney
it is not easy to run 1000 matches
but 10 ppl just run 100 rounds
and we combine the results
then we can get 1000 matches very quickly (from 10 ppl's collaboration)
so I guess anyone can write about the tactics and strategies)
it is like the cloud
and I'm not 100% sure but even stockfish testing framework is based on the cloud perhaps
it is not easy to have one very powerful supercomputer
so there are many computers which are interconnected and correlated with each other on the net via cloud concept
so if there are 100 computers with 8 cores which are connected thru cloud
it is like they have "one" giant supercomputer
with 800 cores working in tendum with others
and that's something!
***
so I'll do this "Chess Tactics and Strategies of the Week"
I can write as many as 10 posts a week I guess
or as little as a few posts a week I think
but here is the thing
I'll not write about a tactic or a strategy
which I read or saw from a book or something like those published materials
for chess learners and chess students
that were made by other ppl
I'll post tactics and strategies that are made by me running a tourney
so I'll watch a plethora of multifarious engine Vs. engine matches
and if I find a really good match (tactically and strategically)
between engines
then I'll post the pgn of the match
along with some key points!
***
the following is one example of such method

the detailed explanation:
https://www.chess2u.com/t7683-amazing-rare-match-rare-showing-of-resilience-by-stockfish
so if I find a really amazing match between engines
like the above aforementioned illustration
I can post the pgn with some diagrams
and comments!
***
the first strategy:

pawn pushing followed by knight capture!

[pgn][Event "Computer Chess Game"]
[Site "USER01"]
[Date "2013.10.14"]
[Round "120"]
[White "Stockfish 091013"]
[Black "Houdini 3 Pro w32"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[TimeControl "60/60"]
[Annotator "17. +0.18 17... +0.12"]
1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. dxc5 Nc6 6. c3 e6 7. Be3 a6 8.
Nbd2 Nxe5 9. h3 Bxf3 10. Nxf3 Nxf3+ 11. Qxf3 Nf6 12. Bd3 Nd7 13. b4 a5 14.
O-O Be7 15. a3 Bf6 16. Bd4 O-O 17. Bc2 {+0.18/16 2.7} e5 {+0.12/15 4} 18.
Qd3 {+0.48/17 1.0} e4 {+0.12/13} 19. Qb5 {+0.42/19 1.5} Qc7 {+0.11/13 1.7}
20. f3 {+0.50/18 1.4} exf3 {+0.23/14 1.4} 21. Qd3 {+0.64/17 1.1} Bxd4+
{+0.23/13} 22. cxd4 {+0.64/17 1.3} Nf6 {+0.22/12 1.0} 23. Qxf3
{+0.44/17 1.1} axb4 {+0.27/15 2.3} 24. axb4 {+0.60/17 1.1} Rxa1
{+0.30/16 1.7} 25. Rxa1 {+0.74/15 0.3} Re8 {+0.24/17 2.6} 26. b5
{+0.75/15 1.1} h6 {+0.38/17 1.4} 27. Ra3 {+0.82/19 6} Re1+ {+0.26/15 1.0}
28. Kf2 {+0.66/19 1.1} Re8 {+0.14/16 1.1} 29. Ra7 {+0.92/18 1.4} Qc8
{+0.26/14 2.4} 30. b6 {+1.21/17 1.2} Re7 {+0.30/16 1.1} 31. Bf5
{+1.51/18 1.6} Qe8 {+0.25/16 1.0} 32. Qa3 {+1.54/19 1.1} Qb5 {+0.47/14 1.0}
33. Ra8+ {+1.57/20 1.4} Re8 {+0.78/16 3} 34. Rxe8+ {+1.57/19 1.3} Qxe8
{+0.80/16 1.1} 35. Qg3 {+1.91/18 1.3} g6 {+0.53/16 2.3} 36. Qe5
{+1.55/19 2.6} Qc6 {+0.78/17 7} 37. Bc2 {+1.59/19 1.2} Nd7 {+0.82/16 4} 38.
Qc7 {+2.30/18 1.1} Qf6+ {+0.82/15} 39. Ke2 {+2.38/20 1.4} Qxd4
{-1.20/14 0.7} 40. Qxd7 {+2.52/17 0.6} Qe5+ {+0.74/16 1.0} 41. Kd3
{+2.52/17 1.2} Qg3+ {-1.17/16 2.9} 42. Kd4 {+2.60/18 1.2} Qf4+
{-1.17/15 0.6} 43. Kc3 {+2.60/19 0.3} Qc4+ {-1.39/16 2.9} 44. Kb2
{+2.60/20 0.5} Qb4+ {-1.50/15 0.7} 45. Ka2 {+2.60/18 1.4} d4 {-1.78/15 2.6}
46. Qe8+ {+3.03/17 1.0} Kg7 {-1.50/14} 47. Qe5+ {+2.88/19 1.5} Kh7
{-1.53/15 0.5} 48. Qg3 {+2.94/20 1.4} d3 {-1.48/15 0.4} 49. Qxd3
{+2.96/20 1.3} Qxc5 {-1.47/15} 50. Bb3 {+3.03/20 1.3} Qa5+ {-1.09/14 0.5}
51. Kb2 {+3.03/19 0.8} Qxb6 {-1.58/14 0.6} 52. Qd5 {+3.15/20 0.9} Qf2+
{-1.54/16 0.6} 53. Kc3 {+2.98/20 1.4} Qf6+ {-1.57/16 0.5} 54. Kd3
{+3.31/18 0.9} Qf1+ {-1.54/16 1.0} 55. Ke3 {+3.35/20 1.5} Qe1+
{-1.58/17 0.6} 56. Kf3 {+3.35/21 1.3} Qf1+ {-1.59/17 0.5} 57. Kg3
{+3.41/22 1.3} Kg7 {-1.65/15 0.6} 58. Qxb7 {+3.41/21 1.4} Qe1+
{-1.37/15 0.5} 59. Kf3 {+3.47/19 1.5} Qf1+ {-1.63/17 0.7} 60. Ke3
{+3.53/18 1.3} Qe1+ {-1.72/16 0.8} 61. Kd3 {+3.51/19 2.2} Qf1+
{-1.61/18 0.9} 62. Kd4 {+3.53/21 1.2} Qg1+ {-1.56/18 1.0} 63. Kc4
{+3.53/22 1.2} Qf1+ {-1.67/18 3} 64. Kb4 {+3.53/21 1.8} Qe1+ {-1.77/18 4}
65. Ka4 {+3.53/20 2.6} Qa1+ {-1.81/18 3} 66. Kb5 {+3.57/15 0.4} Qf1+
{-1.79/18 2.3} 67. Bc4 {+3.63/18 1.1} Qb1+ {-1.74/18 0.8} 68. Kc6
{+3.65/19 1.6} Qe4+ {-1.74/18 2.3} 69. Bd5 {+3.71/20 1.2} Qc2+
{-1.77/17 0.8} 70. Kd6 {+3.73/19 1.3} Qf2 {-1.82/18 1.8} 71. Qb4
{+3.65/21 2.8} Qf6+ {-1.81/15 0.9} 72. Kc7 {+3.65/20 1.4} h5 {-1.89/16 2.8}
73. Qe4 {+3.75/20 1.3} Qc3+ {-1.72/16 0.7} 74. Kd7 {+3.75/20 1.3} Qb2
{-1.78/16 0.6} 75. Qe3 {+3.75/20 1.3} Qb5+ {-1.78/14 0.6} 76. Bc6
{+3.77/21 1.2} Qf5+ {-1.83/17 1.0} 77. Kd6 {+3.73/22 1.1} Qf6+
{-1.79/17 0.6} 78. Kc5 {+3.73/22 1.2} Kh7 {-1.81/17 0.6} 79. Bf3
{+3.81/16 1.4} Qa6 {-1.85/16 0.8} 80. Qd4 {+3.79/16 1.2} Qa3+
{-1.84/17 0.9} 81. Kc6 {+3.75/18 1.0} Qa6+ {-1.83/18 0.7} 82. Kc7
{+3.79/20 0.9} Qe6 {-1.95/17 1.1} 83. Kd8 {+3.79/20 1.1} Kg8 {-1.96/17 0.6}
84. Bb7 {+3.81/18 1.4} Qf5 {-2.08/16 0.6} 85. Bd5 {+3.83/20 0.7} Qg5+
{-1.94/17 0.6} 86. Kd7 {+3.83/21 0.9} Qf5+ {-1.94/18 1.2} 87. Kc6
{+3.75/18 0.6} Qc8+ {-1.85/16 0.8} 88. Kb5 {+3.81/20 0.7} Qe8+
{-1.85/17 0.7}
{Xboard adjudication: 50-move rule} 1/2-1/2[/pgn]