Chess2u
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Chess2uLog in

pollWhich engine do you prefer to analyze your games?

Stockfish
13
46%
Komodo
4
14%
Houdini
4
14%
Rbyka
2
7%
Shredder
1
4%
Critter
1
4%
Other
3
11%
Total Votes:
28

descriptionChess engine for human game analyze EmptyChess engine for human game analyze

more_horiz
Hello all,

I am curious what is your opinion about game analyzing capability of chess engines? Is it equal to their playing power ?
Is this analyzing capability or play sytles hardcoded into engines or is it just settings? If it is setting how could we make an engine analyze human games in a more creative way? Or play beautiful chess games like humankind?

Also which engine do you prefer to analyze your games and why?


I was very interested about Vitruvius because of its approach but seems that it discontinued.

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=25494


Thanks,

Talion

descriptionChess engine for human game analyze EmptyRe: Chess engine for human game analyze

more_horiz
Rybka!

descriptionChess engine for human game analyze EmptyRe: Chess engine for human game analyze

more_horiz
https://www.chess2u.com/t6174-positional-aggressive-active-solid-defensive-chess-engines#36252

descriptionChess engine for human game analyze EmptyRe: Chess engine for human game analyze

more_horiz
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum