What is the best opening book that I can use for for engine vs engine matches that will not result in multiple games being played out with the same moves. Meaning that if I use EngineA against EngineB for 50 matches that for example match 2 does not have the same moves played as in match 6 resulting in the same outcome winner.
Welcome to Chess2U - The Ultimate Computer Chess Forum!
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post and use all thefeatures of the Chess2U forums. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Message [Page 1 of 1]
Perfect2014.ctg opening book is good. I think the only way to avoid repeating opening positions is to run an openings test suite; that way, you get all of the advantages of the openings while being able to choose and control how you wish.
________________
@Nathanael Russell wrote:Perfect2014.ctg opening book is good. I think the only way to avoid repeating opening positions is to run an openings test suite; that way, you get all of the advantages of the openings while being able to choose and control how you wish.
How do I do an "Openings test suite"?
Send me a PM. I will show you.@roland23 wrote:@Nathanael Russell wrote:Perfect2014.ctg opening book is good. I think the only way to avoid repeating opening positions is to run an openings test suite; that way, you get all of the advantages of the openings while being able to choose and control how you wish.
How do I do an "Openings test suite"?
________________
Thank You. I was able to do the engine vs engine match utilizing the "Opening Database". Now I tried to use this Database on an engine tournament consisting of about 4 engines and this engine tournament is a round robin tournament with two cycles. The only thing is that all 12 games are played with the same Database Opening which is the first one from the Opening DB file. If there a way that different randomly openings can be used. This is what results from using the Opening Database:
Match 1) EngineA vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 2) EngineB vs EngineC using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 3) EngineD vs EngineC using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 4) EngineA vs EngineB using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 5) EngineB vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 6) EngineC vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 7) EngineD vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 8) EngineC vs EngineB using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 9) EngineC vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 10) EngineB vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 11) EngineB vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 12) EngineC vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 1)
I want to see if this is possible:
Match 1) EngineA vs EngineD using (Database Opening: Randomly 5)
Match 2) EngineB vs EngineC using (Database Opening: 22)
Match 3) EngineD vs EngineC using (Database Opening: 17)
Match 4) EngineA vs EngineB using (Database Opening: 42)
Match 5) EngineB vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 6) EngineC vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 33)
Match 7) EngineD vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 5, because same DB Opening from Match 1)
Match 8) EngineC vs EngineB using (Database Opening: 22, because same DB Opening from Match 2)
Match 9) EngineC vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 17, because same DB Opening from Match 3)
Match 10) EngineB vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 42, because same DB Opening from Match 4)
Match 11) EngineB vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1, because same DB Opening from Match 5)
Match 12) EngineC vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 33, because same DB Opening from Match 6)
If this is possible in Fritz GUI please let me know. If this is not possible in Fritz GUI, is there any other GUI where this is possible. Anyone that can help me, I would really appreciate it.
Match 1) EngineA vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 2) EngineB vs EngineC using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 3) EngineD vs EngineC using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 4) EngineA vs EngineB using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 5) EngineB vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 6) EngineC vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 7) EngineD vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 8) EngineC vs EngineB using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 9) EngineC vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 10) EngineB vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 11) EngineB vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 12) EngineC vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 1)
I want to see if this is possible:
Match 1) EngineA vs EngineD using (Database Opening: Randomly 5)
Match 2) EngineB vs EngineC using (Database Opening: 22)
Match 3) EngineD vs EngineC using (Database Opening: 17)
Match 4) EngineA vs EngineB using (Database Opening: 42)
Match 5) EngineB vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 6) EngineC vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 33)
Match 7) EngineD vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 5, because same DB Opening from Match 1)
Match 8) EngineC vs EngineB using (Database Opening: 22, because same DB Opening from Match 2)
Match 9) EngineC vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 17, because same DB Opening from Match 3)
Match 10) EngineB vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 42, because same DB Opening from Match 4)
Match 11) EngineB vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1, because same DB Opening from Match 5)
Match 12) EngineC vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 33, because same DB Opening from Match 6)
If this is possible in Fritz GUI please let me know. If this is not possible in Fritz GUI, is there any other GUI where this is possible. Anyone that can help me, I would really appreciate it.
The type of randomization you are looking for is not possible in a database test suite. The function of the test suite moves all participating engines through first opening position and does not move forward until all engines have played that opening. Example:@roland23 wrote:I want to see if this is possible:
Match 1) EngineA vs EngineD using (Database Opening: Randomly 5)
Match 2) EngineB vs EngineC using (Database Opening: 22)
Match 3) EngineD vs EngineC using (Database Opening: 17)
Match 4) EngineA vs EngineB using (Database Opening: 42)
Match 5) EngineB vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1)
Match 6) EngineC vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 33)
Match 7) EngineD vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 5, because same DB Opening from Match 1)
Match 8) EngineC vs EngineB using (Database Opening: 22, because same DB Opening from Match 2)
Match 9) EngineC vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 17, because same DB Opening from Match 3)
Match 10) EngineB vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 42, because same DB Opening from Match 4)
Match 11) EngineB vs EngineD using (Database Opening: 1, because same DB Opening from Match 5)
Match 12) EngineC vs EngineA using (Database Opening: 33, because same DB Opening from Match 6)
First Cycle
Engine A - Position 1
Engine B - Position 1
Engine C - Position 1
Engine D - Position 1
Not...
Engine A - Position 3
Engine B - Position 1
Engine C - Position 24
Engine D - Position 19
What are your intentions? Perhaps I might understand better.
________________
My intentions were to have an engine tournament where not all matches were based on one (two cycles -- round robin) opening from the test suite DB.
If you use an opening test suite, you can utilize as many openings as that test suite will allow and/or you decide to allocate from the opening positions.@roland23 wrote:My intentions were to have an engine tournament where not all matches were based on one (two cycles -- round robin) opening from the test suite DB.
________________
Message [Page 1 of 1]
Related Topics
|
|
|